SEC Dropped Charges Against Ripple Leaders

The dynamic landscape of crypto is once again under the spotlight. A recent decision by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) involving Ripple executives has stirred up the market, highlighting the significant influence of regulatory bodies on the crypto world. This article aims to shed light on this pivotal development and its ripple effects on Ripple’s digital asset, XRP.

Background on the SEC vs. Ripple Case

On December 22, 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs Inc., a company co-founded by Chris Larsen. The lawsuit alleged that Ripple Lab Inc. and its executives had conducted $1.3 billion unregistered securities offerings. 

SEC’s main argument was that XRP, Ripple’s token was not just a currency but also an investment contract under the Securities Act of 1933. An investment contract is a security that is offered to investors to raise capital. 

The lawsuit also raised concerns about institutional sales and distributions to institutional investors which the SEC claimed were done without the necessary disclosures about potential risks. 

The SEC also ruled that about $600 million Ripple on public exchanges were not security offerings because buyers were not purchasing XRP with the expectation of profits. 

However, The court found that the sale of $728.9 million of XRP to hedge funds and other sophisticated buyers was a security offering because these buyers were purchasing XRP with the expectation of profits based on the efforts of Ripple.

In July 2023, a federal judge ruled that the SEC had not adequately explained why XRP should be considered a security. The judge also ruled that the SEC had not provided enough evidence to support its claims of fraud and deception.

Why SEC Dropped Charges

The SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple has been criticized by some for being overly broad for creating uncertainty in the cryptocurrency industry. Ripple in return argued that the SEC’s lawsuit is an attempt to stifle the innovation in the cryptocurrency industry. But the SEC has argued that it’s simply trying to protect investors from fraudulent and unregistered security offerings.

In a timeline 

  • On July 5, 2023 lawyer John Deaton provided some clarity on the timeline of the lawsuit.
  • On July 13, 2023, US District Judge Analisa Torres ruled that XRP was a security when sold directly to institutions but not when offered to the public on exchanges
  • On August 9, 2023, Judge Torres set the schedule for the next steps in the lawsuit, which is often done in a document called a “Pretrial Scheduling Order”.
  • October 19, 2023, The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) asked a federal judge in New York to dismiss its case against Ripple’s co-founder Christian Larsen and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Bradley Garlinghouse
  • In the same month, Judge Torres denied a bid by the SEC for a quick appeal of her judgment
  • October 20, 2023 The SEC voted to dismiss the case against the two Ripple executives. This announcement was made with an agreement by both parties meaning the trial that was expected in April 2024 will not happen now.


Absolutely! The SEC’s decision to drop charges against Ripple’s executives was a pivotal moment in the crypto market, causing XRP’s price to shoot up. This decision not only boosted investor confidence but also highlighted the critical role of clear and consistent regulation in the crypto world.

The outcome of this lawsuit could be a game-changer, influencing not just future crypto projects but also central banks. Despite the storm, Ripple has continued to innovate, offering a platform for central banks to issue digital currencies.

This case is a stark reminder of the rollercoaster ride that is investing in crypto – thrilling, unpredictable, and not for the faint-hearted! It underscores the need for investors to buckle up and brace themselves for the highs and lows that come with investing in this exciting new frontier.

Categorized in: